All documents
Policy brief

County SRHR Financing Brief 2025

What Kisumu County allocates to sexual and reproductive health, what actually reaches adolescents and young people, and five costed asks for FY 2025/26.

Published September 2025Afya Rights InitiativeKisumu, KenyaARI-PB-2025-03v1.028 min readCC BY-NC 4.0
Foreword

Two budget cycles ago, ARI sat in a county-level health stakeholder meeting and watched a senior official shrug at a question about adolescent SRHR allocations. The honest answer, he said, was that nobody could tell him how much of the Department of Health's vote actually reached a 16-year-old in Nyando. That answer stayed with us. This brief is our attempt to close that gap, not by inventing numbers ARI does not have, but by reading the budget documents Kisumu already publishes, naming what is missing, and proposing a small number of changes that can be made within the existing fiscal envelope.

We owe candour to the people we work with. Adolescent girls in Kisumu are not statistical abstractions. They are the reason a post-rape care kit being out of stock at 11pm in Lumumba is not a procurement footnote, it is the difference between a survivor getting PEP within 72 hours and not. The county has the means to fix this. This brief lays out, in detail, how.

We share this with the Department of Health, the County Assembly's Health Committee, the County Treasury, civil society partners, donors, and the public. We invite scrutiny, correction, and the hard work of co-developing a fully costed annexe with anyone in government willing to sit with us.

- The Afya Rights Initiative team

Section 1

Executive summary

9–10%
Approximate share of Kenya's national budget allocated to health, against the 15% Abuja target
≈25%
Approximate share of Kisumu County's total budget allocated to health (CIDP III period)
<5%
ARI estimate: county health spending reaching adolescent-friendly SRHR services
1 in 5
Adolescent girls aged 15–19 in Nyanza region beginning childbearing (KDHS 2022)

The five asks are not new spending categories. Four of the five are already implicit in existing programmes, they simply lack a dedicated budget line, a public reporting requirement, or both. Making them explicit is the work of one county budget cycle.

Section 2

Why this brief, and why now

The FY 2025/26 county budget cycle is underway. The Kisumu County Fiscal Strategy Paper for 2025/26 reaffirms health as one of the county's priority sectors[1]. ARI's position is that this commitment must translate into a protected, ring-fenced line for adolescent and youth-friendly SRHR services, and a transparent reporting line that civil society and the County Assembly can hold to account.

Three things make this particular cycle the right moment.

The donor environment is contracting

Bilateral health financing across the continent has been squeezed since 2024. PEPFAR's Country Operational Plan for Kenya[2] reflects flat-line allocations against rising commodity costs; the Global Fund's GC7 envelope for Kenya[3] emphasises domestic co-financing obligations. Counties that have leaned on donor money to cover adolescent SRHR, and Kisumu is one of them, face a structural risk if they do not begin orderly transitions now.

Adolescent need in Kisumu is acute and well documented

KDHS 2022 records that approximately 21 percent of adolescent girls aged 15–19 in Nyanza region have begun childbearing, the highest of any Kenyan region[4]. PMA Kenya's 2023 family planning brief documents persistent unmet need among sexually active adolescents in Kisumu, with method-stockouts at facility level cited as a recurring barrier[5]. These are not outlier statistics, they are the baseline.

The county already has the policy scaffolding

Kenya's National Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Policy[6] and the Kenya Health Policy 2014–2030[7] both commit the country to adolescent-friendly services. Kisumu's CIDP III[8] names adolescent health as a measurable target. What is missing is not policy. It is a line in the budget.

Section 3

Frameworks and commitments

Table 1. Instruments that already commit Kenya and Kisumu to adolescent SRHR financing
InstrumentWhat it commits Kenya/Kisumu toYear
Abuja DeclarationAllocate ≥15% of the national budget to health2001
Constitution of Kenya, Article 43Right to the highest attainable standard of health, including reproductive health care2010
Kenya Health Policy 2014–2030Universal access to quality health services, including SRHR2014
National ASRH PolicyAdolescent-friendly SRH services nationwide; structured referral pathways2015
ICPD25 Nairobi Summit commitmentsUniversal access to SRH services and rights by 2030; zero unmet need for family planning2019
Kisumu CIDP IIIHealth as a priority sector with measurable adolescent health targets2023–2027
Public Finance Management (County) RegulationsProgramme-based budgeting, with publication of CBRIRs2015
WHO/UNESCO International Technical Guidance on CSEEvidence-informed comprehensive sexuality education in schools2018
Source: ARI compilation from cited national, regional, and international instruments.

The pattern is consistent: Kenya is a signatory or author of every framework that would, if fully implemented, close the adolescent SRHR financing gap. The brief that follows is therefore not an argument for a new policy. It is an argument for budgetary coherence with the policy that already exists.

Section 4

The national picture

Kenya's national budget allocation to health has hovered between 9 and 10 percent for more than a decade, well short of the 15 percent Abuja Declaration target[9][10]. The Parliamentary Budget Office's unpacking of the FY 2024/25 Estimates confirms the pattern[11].

Figure 1. Kenya national health allocation as a share of total budget (selected fiscal years, indicative)
FY 2018/198.7%
FY 2020/219.5%
FY 2022/239.2%
FY 2024/259.6%
Abuja target15.0%
Source: ARI compilation from National Treasury Budget Policy Statements and Parliamentary Budget Office unpacking documents.

Within Ministry of Health spending, Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health (RMNCAH) commands a small slice, and explicit adolescent SRHR programming a smaller slice still. National budget tagging does not currently disaggregate adolescent-specific spend at a level that allows year-on-year comparison[12].

Section 5

The Kisumu picture

Kisumu's County Approved Budget Estimates and successive County Budget Review and Implementation Reports (CBRIRs)[14]show health consistently as the largest or second-largest sector by allocation. The Office of the Controller of Budget's annual county implementation review[15] places Kisumu among the higher-share counties on health.

Figure 2. Kisumu County Department of Health: indicative allocated vs. spent, recent fiscal years
AllocatedActually spent
FY 2021/22
4.8 KES bn
4.4 KES bn
FY 2022/23
5.2 KES bn
4.7 KES bn
FY 2023/24
5.6 KES bn
5 KES bn
FY 2024/25 (projected)
6.1 KES bn
5.6 KES bn
Source: ARI compilation from Kisumu County Approved Budget Estimates and CBRIRs. Figures are indicative and rounded; refer to county Treasury publications for authoritative numbers.

The pattern is an absorption rate consistently in the 88–93 percent range, strong, but with a recurring under-execution on development spending in particular. Within the development line, adolescent-specific infrastructure (such as adolescent-friendly corners and youth-friendly outpatient spaces) is small.

Figure 3. Indicative composition of Kisumu County health spending by line
Personnel emoluments and curative servicesMaternal and child health (general)HIV, TB, malaria (largely donor co-financed)Adolescent and youth SRHR (explicit lines)Preventive, governance, M&E, other
FY 2023/24Total 100
FY 2024/25 (projected)Total 100
Source: ARI estimate based on Kisumu County Approved Budget Estimates and CBRIR (FY 2023/24).

The truth is, on the days the youth corner is open, queues halve in the main outpatient. Closing it because a donor invoice is late is a false economy. We are paying for it in the maternity ward six months later.

Health worker, Level 4 facility, Kisumu Central
Section 6

Sub-county service availability

Kisumu County is divided into seven sub-counties. Below is an ARI synthesis of adolescent SRHR service availability at Level 4 facilities, drawn from county service availability records and ARI-led facility visits in 2024–2025. The matrix is illustrative and intended to support a transparent, contestable scorecard process, not to grade individual facilities.

Table 2. Adolescent-friendly SRHR service availability at flagship Level 4 facilities (illustrative)
Sub-county / facilityAdolescent cornerFamily planning (full method mix)Post-rape care kitsPEP within 72hMental health referral
Kisumu Central, JOOTRH
Kisumu East, Lumumba SCH
Kisumu West, Chulaimbo CRH
Nyando, Ahero County Hospital
Nyakach, Pap-Onditi SCH
Muhoroni, Muhoroni SCH
Seme, Kombewa CRH
Source: ARI facility visits, 2024–2025; cross-checked against the Kenya Master Health Facility List and county records. ✓ = service routinely available; ◐ = available intermittently or with referral; ✗ = not available.
Section 7

What reaches adolescents

Of the funding that does reach adolescents and young people in Kisumu, the largest single category is HIV testing and prevention, largely donor co-financed. Family planning commodities are partly nationally procured through KEMSA. Standalone budget lines for adolescent-friendly health corners, peer-led SRHR education, post-rape care kits, and survivor accompaniment are either small, irregular, or absent.

Figure 4. Indicative adolescent SRHR cascade in Kisumu County (annual, illustrative)
1. Adolescents aged 10–19 in Kisumu County320,000
KNBS 2019 census, age-band projection to 2025.
2. Adolescents needing an SRHR contact in a given year145,000(45% of start)
Conservative 45% prevalence of need across information, contraception, STI screening, mental health, GBV.
3. Adolescents who reach a health facility for an SRHR concern62,000(19% of start)
Estimated facility utilisation, all entry points.
4. Adolescents who receive an adolescent-friendly service21,000(7% of start)
ARI estimate based on adolescent corner throughput at flagship facilities.
5. Adolescents linked, retained or accompanied (3+ contacts)8,400(3% of start)
Linkage and retention is the weakest link in the current configuration.
Source: ARI illustrative cascade based on KDHS 2022, county service records, and ARI programme data. Figures are indicative.

The shape of this cascade is the brief in one image. The drop-off between need and contact, and between contact and adolescent- appropriate service, is what county SRHR financing has the authority and the means to address.

Section 8

Voices from the cascade

The cascade above is statistical. The decisions inside it are not. The two composite case studies below illustrate where county financing decisions land in a single life.

Case study

Akinyi, 17

Awasi/Onjiko ward
March 2025
Situation
Akinyi presented at a Level 4 facility in Nyando at 9pm on a Thursday after a sexual assault. The post-rape care kit was out of stock. The on-call clinical officer used a partial kit and made a referral note for PEP, but the pharmacy was closed until morning.
ARI response
The ARI rapid-response volunteer, called by a community health promoter, drove Akinyi to a partner facility in Kisumu Central where PEP was initiated within the 72-hour window. Forensic documentation was completed and a survivor accompaniment plan opened.
Outcome
Akinyi received the full 28-day PEP course, mental health support, and pregnancy prevention. The case is closed. The underlying reason for the drive, a stocked-out kit on a weeknight, has not been addressed by any county budget line.

Composite case study, anonymised. Names, ages and identifying details have been changed to protect the individuals concerned.

Case study

Brian, 16

Kondele ward
June 2025
Situation
Brian, an out-of-school adolescent boy, walked into a youth corner in Kisumu East asking for STI screening and information about contraception for his partner. The corner had been closed for the week because the seconded peer educator's donor-funded stipend was four months in arrears.
ARI response
An ARI peer educator covered the day, conducted screening, referred for treatment, and counselled Brian on contraceptive options. The corner reopened later that month following a short-term donor extension.
Outcome
Brian was screened and treated. The donor extension is time-limited. Without a county budget line for the peer educator post, the corner will close again in the coming quarter.

Composite case study, anonymised. Names, ages and identifying details have been changed to protect the individuals concerned.

Section 9

The donor dependence problem

Donor financing is not, in itself, a problem. The problem is its location in the financing stack. Across Kisumu's adolescent SRHR provision, donor money has migrated from filling gaps to holding up structural posts: peer educator stipends, adolescent corner rents, transport for survivor accompaniment, and even some consumables. When that financing slows, the structure does not flex, it closes.

Figure 5. ARI estimated share of selected adolescent SRHR cost categories carried by donors in Kisumu County
Peer educator stipends and youth corner staffing≈88%
Post-rape care kits beyond KEMSA baseline≈72%
Adolescent SRHR information / IEC materials≈65%
Survivor accompaniment transport≈60%
Family planning commodities (top-up)≈30%
Source: ARI synthesis from facility interviews, partner reports, and donor allocation letters (2023–2024). Figures are indicative.
Section 10

The gaps we see

  1. No dedicated, ring-fenced adolescent SRHR line in the county health vote, making mid-year reallocations easy and predictable.
  2. Limited explicit budget for survivor pathways: post-rape care kits, forensic-quality referral, and accompaniment costs.
  3. No public quarterly scorecard tracking adolescent SRHR outcomes against allocations.
  4. Heavy dependence on donor co-financing for the most adolescent-facing services, with no published transition plan.
  5. Comprehensive sexuality education delivery in schools is uneven and largely an unfunded mandate at the school level[16].
  6. No standing co-decision forum where adolescents themselves are consulted on the line items that affect them most.
Section 11

Recommendations

The recommendations below are designed to be costed, traceable, and feasible within existing county fiscal space. Each is paired with a budget owner and a measurable indicator that can be reported quarterly.

Table 3. Five recommendations for FY 2025/26
#RecommendationOwnerQuarterly indicator
1Ring-fenced adolescent SRHR budget line within the county health voteDepartment of Health, County Treasury% of vote disbursed; % executed
2Costed funding for post-rape care kits at every Level 4 facility, with stock-out rulesDepartment of HealthDays out of stock per facility
3Quarterly public scorecard of adolescent SRHR allocations and outputsDepartment of Health, Health CommitteeScorecard published Q+30 days
4Five-year transition plan to reduce donor structural dependenceCounty Treasury% structural costs on county vote
5Costed support for CSE delivery in public schoolsDepartment of Education and Skills DevelopmentTrained teachers per school
6Standing adolescent advisory group reviewing the relevant budget linesCounty Assembly Health CommitteeMeetings held; minutes published
Source: ARI.
Section 12

Specific budget asks for FY 2025/26

KES 32m
Ring-fenced adolescent SRHR line within the county health vote
KES 8m
Post-rape care kits and survivor pathway costs across all Level 4 facilities
KES 4m
Quarterly scorecard production, dissemination, and audit-ready data quality
KES 6m
Costed support for CSE delivery in public schools (teacher facilitation)

Total indicative ask: KES 50 million, less than 0.7 percent of the projected county health vote. ARI is willing to co-develop a fully costed annexe with the Department of Health and the County Assembly's relevant committees within 30 days of a formal request.

Section 13

Towards a county SRHR scorecard

ARI is building, with partners, a public quarterly scorecard tracking the recommended budget lines, post-rape care kit availability, adolescent-friendly service utilisation, and a small bank of community-reported indicators. We invite the Department of Health and the County Assembly to co-own it from the outset.

Table 4. Proposed scorecard indicator set (v0.9)
DomainIndicatorSourceCadence
AllocationAdolescent SRHR ring-fenced line (KES, % of health vote)County TreasuryAnnual + quarterly
Execution% of ring-fenced line disbursed and absorbedTreasury / DoHQuarterly
InputsAdolescent corners with full staffing and stockDoH / facility auditQuarterly
OutputsAdolescent contacts (corner throughput, referrals)DHIS2 / facility recordsMonthly
OutcomesAdolescent contraceptive prevalence (15–19, modern methods)PMA / KDHS / facility proxyAnnual
SurvivorsDays out of stock for post-rape care kits per facilityFacility logsQuarterly
VoiceAdolescent advisory group meetings held; recommendations adoptedHealth Committee minutesQuarterly
Source: ARI, drawing on the National ASRH Policy indicator framework and PMA Kenya.
Section 14

Methodology, limitations, and ethics

Annex A

Costed budget lines (indicative working sheet)

Table 5. Annex A, Indicative line-by-line costing of the five asks (KES, FY 2025/26)
RefLine itemUnitVolumeUnit cost (KES)Total (KES)
A1.1Adolescent corner staffing, clinical officer (50% FTE)FTE-yr73600002520000
A1.2Adolescent corner staffing, peer educator stipendPerson-yr141440002016000
A1.3Corner consumables and IEC materialsFacility-yr142200003080000
A1.4M&E and supportive supervisionQuarter48500003400000
A1.5Outreach (mobile adolescent service days)Outreach60950005700000
A1.6Contingency on A1 linesLump sum115000001500000
A2.1Post-rape care kits (24/7 buffer per Level 4)Kit120045005400000
A2.2Survivor accompaniment transportTrip60025001500000
A2.3Forensic referral fees and laboratory backupTest3502800980000
A3.1Scorecard production (design, data, publication)Quarter48500003400000
A3.2Independent data quality auditAudit2300000600000
A4.1Transition plan facilitation (joint Treasury/DoH)Workshop46000002400000
A5.1CSE teacher facilitation honorariaTeacher-yr240180004320000
A5.2CSE materials top-upSchool80140001120000
Total (indicative)38436000
Source: ARI working sheet. Numbers are indicative and offered as a starting point for joint costing with the Department of Health.

The total in this annex (KES ~38m) is below the headline KES 50m ask in Section 12 because Section 12 includes a contingency envelope and absorbs costs ARI would not formally cost without shared assumptions with the Department of Health.

Annex B

Indicator definitions

The following are the working definitions ARI proposes for the scorecard. Each is open to amendment in joint design.

  • Adolescent contact: any encounter with a public health facility by a person aged 10–19 in which an SRHR-related service or referral occurs.
  • Adolescent-friendly service: a service delivered in compliance with the National ASRH Policy criteria - confidentiality, non-judgemental staff, age-appropriate information, and acceptable wait times.
  • Out of stock: a recorded period of any duration during which a post-rape care kit is not available at a designated 24/7 entry point.
  • Linkage: a documented onward contact within the window appropriate to the index visit (e.g. PEP D14 follow-up; contraceptive method continuation visit).
Reference

Glossary

ASRH
Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health.
Abuja Declaration
2001 commitment by African Union states to allocate ≥15% of national budgets to health.
CBRIR
County Budget Review and Implementation Report, a quarterly/annual report on county budget execution.
CFSP
County Fiscal Strategy Paper, an annual policy document setting the broad parameters of a county's next budget.
CIDP
County Integrated Development Plan, a five-year plan setting county priorities and targets.
CSE
Comprehensive Sexuality Education, age- and developmentally-appropriate sexuality education.
DHIS2
District Health Information System 2, Kenya's routine health information platform.
FTE
Full-time equivalent, staffing measure equivalent to one full-time post.
GBV
Gender-Based Violence.
ICPD25
The 2019 Nairobi Summit on the 25th anniversary of the International Conference on Population and Development.
JOOTRH
Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kisumu.
KDHS
Kenya Demographic and Health Survey, a periodic nationally representative household survey.
KEMSA
Kenya Medical Supplies Authority, central medical commodities procurement and distribution agency.
KNBS
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.
MTEF
Medium Term Expenditure Framework, three-year rolling national budget envelope.
OSC
One-Stop Centre for survivors of sexual and gender-based violence.
PEP
Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, antiretroviral medication started within 72 hours of HIV exposure.
PMA
Performance Monitoring for Action, a multi-country health survey programme.
PRC
Post-rape care, clinical and psychosocial care provided to survivors of sexual violence.
RMNCAH
Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health.
Acknowledgements

ARI thanks the health workers, community health promoters, adolescent advisory group members, school leaders, and county officials who gave their time to the visits and interviews that informed this brief. We thank the partner organisations whose public reports we draw on. We thank the journalists in Kisumu who continue to interrogate the county budget cycle. Errors are ours alone.

References

Bibliography

  1. [1]County Government of Kisumu (2025). County Fiscal Strategy Paper for FY 2025/26. County Treasury, Kisumu.
  2. [2]PEPFAR (2024). Kenya Country Operational Plan 2024 Strategic Direction Summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State.
  3. [3]The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (2024). Allocation Letter, Kenya, GC7 2024–2026. Geneva.
  4. [4]Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Health, National AIDS Control Council, Kenya Medical Research Institute, National Council for Population and Development, & ICF (2023). Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2022. KNBS and ICF.
  5. [5]PMA Kenya (2023). PMA2022/Kenya Phase 3: Family Planning Brief. Performance Monitoring for Action, Kisumu and four other counties.
  6. [6]Ministry of Health, Kenya (2015). National Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Policy. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.
  7. [7]Ministry of Health, Kenya (2014). Kenya Health Policy 2014–2030. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.
  8. [8]County Government of Kisumu (2023). Kisumu County Integrated Development Plan III, 2023–2027. Department of Economic Planning and ICT, Kisumu.
  9. [9]African Union (2001). Abuja Declaration on HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Other Related Infectious Diseases. Organisation of African Unity, Abuja, Nigeria, 24–27 April 2001.
  10. [10]World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa (2011). The Abuja Declaration: Ten Years On. Brazzaville: WHO AFRO.
  11. [11]Parliamentary Budget Office, Kenya (2024). Unpacking of the FY 2024/25 Estimates of Revenue and Expenditure. Nairobi: Parliament of Kenya.
  12. [12]Wamai, R. G., Karanja, F., Kabiru, E., Wachira, J., & Boore, J. R. P. (2022). Health system strengthening in Kenya: progress, gaps and the road ahead. The Lancet Global Health Commission Working Paper.
  13. [13]National Treasury and Economic Planning, Kenya (2024). Budget Policy Statement and Medium Term Expenditure Framework 2025/26–2027/28. Nairobi.
  14. [14]County Government of Kisumu (2024). County Budget Review and Implementation Report, FY 2023/24. County Treasury, Kisumu.
  15. [15]Office of the Controller of Budget, Kenya (2024). Annual County Governments Budget Implementation Review Report, FY 2023/24. Nairobi.
  16. [16]World Health Organization, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNICEF, UN Women, & UNAIDS (2018). International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education: An evidence-informed approach. Revised edition. Paris: UNESCO.
  17. [17]Republic of Kenya (2010). Constitution of Kenya, Article 43(1)(a), Right to the highest attainable standard of health, including reproductive health care.
  18. [18]United Nations Population Fund (2019). Nairobi Statement on ICPD25: Accelerating the Promise. Nairobi Summit on ICPD25, 12–14 November 2019.
  19. [19]Sully, E. A., Biddlecom, A., Darroch, J. E., Riley, T., Ashford, L. S., Lince-Deroche, N., Firestein, L., & Murro, R. (2020). Adding It Up: Investing in Sexual and Reproductive Health 2019. New York: Guttmacher Institute.
  20. [20]UNFPA Kenya (2023). Country Programme Document for Kenya, 2022–2026. Nairobi: United Nations Population Fund.
  21. [21]Tropical Health and Education Trust (2022). Kenya Health Workforce Investment Brief. London: THET.
  22. [22]Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (2023). Kenya Population and Housing Census Volume IV: Distribution by Socio-Economic Characteristics. Nairobi.
  23. [23]Ministry of Public Service, Gender, Senior Citizens Affairs and Special Programmes (2014, revised 2024). National Policy for the Prevention and Response to Gender-Based Violence. Nairobi.
  24. [24]Parliamentary Service Commission, Kenya (2023). Public Finance Management (County Governments) Regulations, 2015, Compliance Note.
  25. [25]Office of the Auditor-General, Kenya (2024). Report on the Financial Statements of the County Government of Kisumu for the year ended 30 June 2023. Nairobi.
  26. [26]BCG Social Impact (2023). Adolescent Health Investment Case for sub-Saharan Africa. Boston Consulting Group, in partnership with the African Union.
About Afya Rights Initiative

Afya Rights Initiative (ARI) is a youth-led community organisation based in Kisumu, Kenya, working at the intersection of sexual and reproductive health rights, gender-based violence response, and adolescent education. We accompany girls, young women and key populations across Kisumu County and push for county-level policy and budget changes that make their rights real.

Contact
hello@afyarightsinitiative.or.ke
+254 717 558 070
Kisumu, Kenya
Document
ARI-PB-2025-03
v1.0
September 2025
Registration
Community-based organisation registration with the State Department for Social Protection, Kenya.
License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Suggested citation

Afya Rights Initiative (2025). County SRHR Financing Brief 2025. Kisumu, Kenya. ARI-PB-2025-03. Released under CC BY-NC 4.0.